The Nietzsche Super-MBA

David M. Boje

September 1, 1999

See Reply 2001 

My story starts July 10, 1999, after this new book was drafted, taking some time off, sitting on one of the nude beaches on one of the Canary Islands, imagining what it was like when Columbus picked up his combat dogs on his second voyage to the West Indies. I brought a copy of Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil and ignoring the clothing-optional bathing beauties and the World Cup windsurfing champions doing 360 degree, end for end flips, began to read. His book is about the festival of Dionysis, the celebration of dance, laughter, feasting, and clothing-optional. Here is the Canary Islands, the endless post-work festival, the end of work ethic, the celebration of play. What a daring book, to go beyond the duality of good and evil, to argue that species advance by both will to life and will to power. Life is frightfully unjust; not equitable an equity of rich and poor. Exploitation is the essence of the will to life, the hunt for power. Nietzsche thought Plato too much the appreciative inquirer, too focused on happiness, equality, and democracy. Rather than pick good over evil, Nietzsche saw the value of a tragic philosophy. The good romantic story of the American Dream combines with the tragic story of poverty wages. Many willing submit to wage slavery and seek a gentle master; they can not abide freedom.

I found the quote Steve Best made to my OT class last semester, the one that prompted three months of email, "One should not go into churches if one wants to breath pure air" and gave it yet another highlight (Beyond Good and Evil written in 1886, hereafter BGE, p. 62). I found another I also like, "Why could the world which is of any concern to us - not be a fiction?" (p. 66). I thought of the movie Matrix. But this is not for me the point of BGE in the MBA program. It is more in this quote:

The question is to what extent it is life-advancing, life-preserving, species-preserving, perhaps even species-breeding" (BGE, p. 35).

Why do I keep silent about these points? Did Nietzsche foresee the BioTech Century we have just begun?

 

The Will to Simplify - I will confess that reading Beyond Good and Evil for the seventh time, I did finally get it. There on page 160, Nietzsche told it clear, the MBA wants to assimilate the complex and to make complex simple and therefore must repel and reject what is contradictory. "Out of multiplicity [the MBA student] has the will to simplicity" (BGE, p. 160). Here was my answer on how to teach MBAs; simplify the complex. It dawned on me, I am always making the simple complex, running up stream to the MBA interest. To Nietzsche, and me "every surface is a cloak" (BGE, p. 161). The MBA will to power is a will to simplify, to substitute surface for the complex, simple for complex.

7 S Maps of OT - I wondered what Frederick would think of the 7 Ss of OT, the ones from the In Search of Excellence and Boston Consulting Group heyday?. Would he think them simple and comfortable fictions? You already know the 7 Ss of OT:

 

1.      Structure - At the center draw a circle with Structure (mechanistic or organic). Around this draw 6 more circles with lines connected to this center circle and to neighboring circles.

2.      Strategy - Usually situated to the right of your drawing, the general or specialist vision of where the organization is going on its adventure.

3.      Style of Leadership - Often placed at left to give a sense of whom is steering the structure to enact its strategy. There are so many styles to choose, autocratic and democratic are two.

4.      Situation - Always on top of the map. The organization is situated in an environment, be it turbulent or placid, chaotic of simple, so they say.

5.      Systems - At bottom is the system of systems, all the sequences of processes, the technologies, communication, and other systems that inter-twine. The open systems recognize the situation of the organization, the closed ones, are not open to feedback beyond the factory walls. Systems became quite popular after WWII, but did not make it big in OT until March and Simon (1958), then Thompson (1967) and Weick's (1976) social psychology of organizing, that restoried "organization" into "organizing." I apologize for leaving these great works out of Table One. I will mend the map next time.

6.      Size - Small or large, but most of the courses of the MBA favor large, but small business and entrepreneurship is increasingly popular.

7.      Synergy - Habit 6 in the Steve Covey (1989) book, and the mainstay of the Disney University, pretender to the throne of MBA training.

How would Nietzsche respond to the 7 Ss? "The cult of surfaces!" (BGE, p 85). To the MBA the 7 Ss is a great idea. Look at how such a map simplifies the complex, makes history unnecessary as Steve Robbins tells us in his most recent management texts, something worthy of an appendix, irrelevant to the serious management student. With 7, you can select some S-signs and ignore so many more. In the MBA student, there is a "well to simplify," part of the "will to power." Seven Ss is solution oriented, taking the complex and rendering it simple, without contradiction, a work of synergetic surfaces.

Dear MBA,

Each era posits an OT with its own 7Ss. Each one an apologetic for the way BGE is to be done, to lower resistance to the newest socio-techno-scheme.

OT exists in perpetual renewal, each era saying it has found the "real" 7 Ss. History shows this to be a mask, an act of spectacle showmanship, a cover story.

I really got into the Ss. I keep doing that, take a simple theory, start moving historically and globally and before you know it the simple is so very complex. Yet, would you agree that the 7s of the 1960s, the 1970s, 1980s and 1990 are quite different Ss? And if they are, why are they different?

Keep OT Simple. I think MBAs (in contrast to Ph.D.s) prefer a course in OT taught with an eye to "Making Things Simple" (recipes like the 7 S's of OT or the 7 Habits of Leadership) and a course that makes them comfortable, rich with positive visions of their financial future, and an appreciative inquiry. To "Make Things Simple" is to seek highly practical case examples in OT. For Nietzsche the MBA, I think, would be the Super-MBA," someone who recognizing that you can not do away with the suffering of the world, exploit it because, in suffering there is creative destruction (BGE, p. 155). Where Hobbes was into mechanistic OT in a big way, for Nietzsche, it was all organic OT, a will to power that was an organic will to life. The mechanistic he argues is the master morality, the organic the slave's morality, the two together make up the mixed culture of organized life (BGE, p. 144-5). The ruination of a Super-MBA is to become softhearted, to be either democratic or egalitarian, to back away from exploitation, the organic function of life. The Super-MBA, Nietzsche might argue, should be strong of spirit, recognize that to exploit is to speed up creative suffering and bring the adventurer and conqueror success (Nietzsche's 7s). The discipline of suffering:

"That tension of the sould in misfortune which cultivates its strength, its terror at the site of great destruction, its inventiveness and bravery in undergoing, interpreting, exploiting misfortune, and whatever of depth, mystery, mask, spirit, cunning and greatness have bestowed upon it - has it not been bestowed through suffering, through the discipline of great suffering?" (BGE p. 155).

Keep OT Complex. As you can see by the density of citations in Table One, I tend to gravitate to the "Makes Things Complicated" and the part of the world of OT that "Makes People Uncomfortable." Still I would think that every MBA would put Beyond Good and Evil on their executive desk. "Oh festival" says Nietzsche, "the wedding day has come for light and darkness" (BGE, p. 222-223). The MBA does create values, invent values, and discover values in the contest of nature. Learning the art of command is learning not to be part of the herd or the herd instincts.

I see a complex spectacle - Mine is the will to multiplicity, to deconstruct simple surfaces. Clumsy spectators will insist, just give me one chart of 7Ss and Boje do the work of the Business College, KISS. Only with one chart, the best one, can the MBA feel themselves master, in a will to simplify.

Philosophy, be it (skeptical or affirmative) critical theory or postmodern theory "Makes Things Complicated," With a more critical pedagogy for MBAs, the focus shifts from managers are the world, to a look at the three billion peasantariat some writers (Burrell 1997; Kotke, 1993 and Korten, 1995) argue the managers are taught in Business College to ignore. The focus is on the .001% super rich (e.g. I read Bill Gates has as much wealth as one billion people do). Since Hobbes, the managerial class has been trained to be an elite that governs the 3 billion peasants and the wage slaves who make up most of the other 3 billion. People feel obliged to be wage slaves as long as the spectacle of production and consumption promises happiness.

 


MBA’s Rely by Mike Kelley See K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Stupid