I copied this file from Nike Inc. web site. The file is dated Friday, June 19, 1998 5:38:15 PM and was last modified Saturday, February 14, 1998 3:08:42 PM - D. Boje NIKfaqECONDev
Q. "How do NIKE subcontractors promote economic
development?"
A.
Light manufacturing (starting usually with a flannel
short factory and then a T-shirt factory and finally a
jeans factory), leads to moderately technical light
manufacturing (outerwear and performance sportswear,
sports shoes), and then to light technical consumer
products manufacturing (radio's, calculators,
wristwatches), and finally to technical durables
(automobiles, computers). Sometimes these occur in
tandem (Korea), sometimes in sequence (Taiwan), and
sometimes the country graduates without the final
stages and heads directly into the post-industrial
service economy (Singapore, Hong Kong).
NIKE has been and continues to be a driver of the
first two steps. It is doubtful that any other light
manufactured brand is responsible for a comparable
record of jobs creation NIKE has built over the past
25 years. At present there are nearly 500,000+ jobs
directly engaged in manufacturing our products; to
date Korea alone has exported well over 500 million
pairs of NIKE shoes; to date NIKE accounts, after just
two years, for 5% of all of Vietnam's export earnings.
These are undisputed facts that demonstrate the
economic good this company creates when it works with
partners around Asia and around the world.
Q.
"Don’t you just move your production from country to
country, searching for the cheapest labor?"
A.
For years, critics have tried to contend that NIKE
fled "high-cost, unionized" Korea and Taiwan for
"low-cost, repressive" Vietnam, China and Indonesia.
Over those years, NIKE has repeatedly pointed out that
we remain in Korea and Taiwan as a buyer, despite
higher wages and labor rights. NIKE is in fact the
only branded athletic footwear company still making
shoes in Taiwan and South Korea.
In the last three years we have expanded our footwear
sourcing country list to include three countries:
Vietnam, Italy and the Philippines. Two of the three,
Italy and the Philippines, are vibrant democracies.
The third, Vietnam, has a recent record of promoting
workers rights through government labor bureaus.
Incidentally, Italy has the highest wage base of any
NIKE footwear sourcing country, and the Philippines
has a minimum wage that is twice that of Indonesia,
and three times that of China and Vietnam.
Q.
"Why doesn’t NIKE contribute more to communities where
they sell their products?"
A.
NIKE is actively involved in communities worldwide,
from getting kids to play sports and supporting
mentoring programs to building sport courts in
under-served areas and training volunteer coaches.
In 1994 NIKE launched P.L.A.Y. (Participate in the
Lives of All Youth) to provide kids access to
inspirational coaches, organized activities and safe
places to play.
NIKE has made a $5 million commitment to the Boys &
Girls Club of America to train 40,000 volunteer
coaches, triple girls participation in Club activities
and increase overall youth participation in Boys &
Girls Clubs by two million kids.
In the Asia-Pacific region, NIKE is beginning a
micro-loan program for women workers in Vietnam to
help economic development in areas where factories
make NIKE products and to empower Vietnamese women.
Each year, NIKE recycles over two million athletic
shoes into sport courts such as basketball, tennis and
playground surfaces for under-served neighborhoods.
We’ve built over 50 courts worldwide, 30 in the United
States alone.
Q.
"Does free trade promote human rights?"
A.
Absolutely. Taiwan and Korea are prime examples, and
NIKE has been working in those countries for more than
two decades. Indeed, though some would say the
development of those rights has taken place quite
apart from our participation in business, in fact the
creation of jobs and the promotion of a climate where
workers are treated with dignity and respect in the
factories cannot help but have a positive impact on
values in the community at large.
The classic issue here is the glass half-empty or half
full perspective. Does NIKE by its presence foster
higher levels of respect for rights -- at least in the
factories? Or does our presence foster repression in
countries where governments do not recognize some of
the rights we in western democracies hold dear? NIKE
firmly believes -- and the record supports -- the
concept that our presence helps.